
Today I finished "The Magician's Nephew" by C.S. Lewis. I read it to get used to his style of writing because I endeavour to read "Mere Christianity" which I got as a Christmas present from my parents. After finishing the former, I thought myself prepared to read the latter, but to my surprise (which is silly for I shouldn't be surprised), Lewis' writing style is much more developed and quick in his "adult" literature than in his "children's". Therefore, in an attempt to understand his book, I will blog about it. Here goes nothing :)
Be prepared for over analysis and questions that you are welcomed to answer.
I even found myself rereading paragraphs in his preface, so I will start there.
In his preface to Mere Christianity, Lewis explains that the book will not be about different denominations, but focused on what the Christian belief is. He notes that he believes the word Christian means someone "who accepts the common doctrines of Christianity." I suppose the book will continue on to explain more about what he thinks the common doctrines of Christianity are. He then goes on to explain that people extort the word Christian into a descriptive word of which it is not, making it a useless word (he took a long time trying to explain this, but I was left reading the paragraphs over again and still am trying to understand this)
"It is not for us to say who, in the deepest sense, is or is not close to the spirit of Christ...We cannot judge, and are indeed forbidden to judge. It would be wicked arrogance for us to say that any man is, or is not, a Christian in this refined sense." I suppose I could question this statement, but I would probably be upturned by those who actually know what they are talking about.
Another statement I found rather questionable (in a sense) was "When a man who accepts the Christian doctrine lives unworthily of it, it is much clearer to say he is a bad Christian than to say he is not a Christian." This brings up questions like: "Why would that man accept a doctrine he would rather not live by?" or "if we all fall short, then what would make a Christian a 'good Christian'?" ...etc...etc.
His last couple paragraphs of the preface explain that Christianity is like a hallway with many doors. Each door represents a different denomination, and the hallway represents the common doctrine of Christianity. You as a Christian are to find which door is the truth, not which door suits you best or is the prettiest.
Book One is entitled "Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe": Chapter One entitled "The Law of Human Nature." Lewis does a good job of explaining that like the Law of Gravity, there is also a Law of Right and Wrong. People try to disprove this by saying that there is no set Law because different people have different morals and so forth. I think what Lewis is trying to get at is that though people have different opinions on morals, there are still morals.
Next Lewis explains that every human breaks the Law. This is closely followed by the human making excuses for his or herself.
Next Lewis explains that every human breaks the Law. This is closely followed by the human making excuses for his or herself.
I've read on more and could probably explain more, but I've decided to limit my blogging to questions that I'm faced with in the book, or else I'll probably end up spending the night at the computer desk.
Anyways...I like it so far and hope to gain something from it.
Merry Christmas everyone!!
(google pic of CS Lewis)